Strixformes

I study structures.I build them too.

Strixformes is the name I use for the structure behind what I create. I build companies, products and systems, but I do not think any one of them explains me. I am interested in what makes things behave the way they do — the relationship, the rule, the feedback, the observer. Sometimes that question becomes software. Sometimes a business. Sometimes philosophy. Sometimes it stays a question until I understand it better.

OLUSEHINDE ELIJAH KOLAWOLE

63 NODES91 RELATIONS

Enter the map

Some questions become things.

The OwletSocial media growth infrastructure, moving toward a workspace creators operate from.active SABIPeople as internet infrastructure — real actions behind the numbers.active Gamers360Games, tasks and rewards — which turned into a live laboratory for incentive design.active NYRAAccess, not desire.active QuickShopA website for any use case, built in under a minute — the distance between deciding and being open, shortened.active SpykesSlow time down — make emerging movement legible before it is obvious.building

Every system

The first explanation does not need to survive.

REV · WHY

A system is a relationship changing under a ruleParts, plus a rule between them, produce behaviour over time.stable Positive feedback amplifies. Negative feedback stabilises.Growth and control are one design problem, not two.stable ThresholdsWhere growth becomes instability.developing Human infrastructureMany digital systems ultimately run on coordinated human action.developing Access, not desirePossibility depends less on wanting than on what you can actually reach.stable Self-structureHow an organised self may shape what becomes salient, attended to and believed.exploring The observer and the observedWhether a thing can be described without specifying the position it is described from.exploring Where does friction belong?Restriction is not good or bad. It has a location.exploring What minimum property distinguishes reaction from experience?How would we demonstrate that a system lacks subjective awareness?exploring

The archive

RES.99 · PREPRINT

Some questions need proving.

Can understanding and changing the relationships inside a system preserve an action you had already decided to take? I have spent this year trying to state that precisely enough to be wrong about.

{SF}_{H} (ℐ_{0}) = max_{π} min_{ω} min_{t, i} \frac{h_{i} (Z_{t}^{π, ω})}{s_{i}}

A preprint, deposited and citable. Not peer reviewed, not a new theorem, and the counterexamples are the part I trust. 10.5281/zenodo.23372032

The research Run the model

Observation changes when the observer becomes still.

IN ROTATION SINCE 2023SABIMohbad

Building

Platforms for commerce, access, coordination, infrastructure and human interaction
Robotics and engineering

Studying

Position as a foundation for relationships
Total geometry as the boundary of permissible positions
Coherence as conditions change within a structure

Thinking about

How structures permit existence, relationships, behaviour and change
Relational viability under incomplete observation
Feedback and emergence

OPENHow do you amplify hard enough to grow, and stabilise hard enough to survive it?